USDAW and Woolworths judgment on collective redundancy consultation now published

by Laurie Anstis on July 1, 2013

The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now published its judgment in the USDAW, Woolworths and Ethel Austin case on collective redundancy consultation.

In accordance with earlier reports, HHJ McMullen QC has ruled that (para 53): “the words “at one establishment” should be deleted from section 188 as a matter of construction pursuant to our obligations to apply the Directive’s purpose.”

2 comments

[…] [Update 1 July 2013 – the full judgment has now been published.] […]

by "Establishment" and collective redundancy consultation - USDAW and Woolworths « Work/Life/Law Work/Life/Law on 1 July 2013 at 4:50 pm. #

[…] this week, the Employment Appeal Tribunal in England and Wales published its judgment in the USDAW v Woolworths case holding that the words “at one establishment” should be deleted from section 188 of the […]

by Northern Ireland Industrial Tribunal refers questions on the definition of "establishment" to the European Court « Work/Life/Law Work/Life/Law on 4 July 2013 at 6:45 pm. #